1998 Bentley Turbo vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Bentley Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Bentley Turbo would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 10 kg more than 1998 Bentley Turbo.
Because 1998 Bentley Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Bentley Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Bentley Turbo (800 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 647 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1998 Bentley Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Bentley Turbo | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Bentley | Nissan |
Model | Turbo | Livina |
Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 800 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2395 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 94 L | 52 L |