1998 BMW 316 vs. 1962 Steyr 700C
To start off, 1998 BMW 316 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW 316 (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1962 Steyr 700C. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1962 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 316 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1962 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW 316 (165 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Steyr 700C. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1998 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Steyr 700C.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 316 | 1962 Steyr 700C | |
Make | BMW | Steyr |
Model | 316 | 700C |
Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 641 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1950 mm |