1998 BMW 316 vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 1998 BMW 316 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1998 BMW 316. (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 316 weights approximately 794 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW 316 | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
| Make | BMW | Lotus |
| Model | 316 | 25 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 196 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 456 kg |
