1998 BMW 316 vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 1998 BMW 316 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW 316 (103 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 316 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW 316 | 1966 DKW Munga | |
| Make | BMW | DKW |
| Model | 316 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 31 L |
