1998 BMW 316 vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1998 BMW 316 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1998 BMW 316. (103 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 782 kg more than 1998 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 316 | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 316 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1998 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |