1998 BMW 316 vs. 1974 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1998 BMW 316 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1998 BMW 316. (103 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 970 kg more than 1998 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 316 | 1974 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 316 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1998 | 1974 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 7732 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3390 mm |