1998 BMW 316 vs. 1982 Nissan Leopard

To start off, 1998 BMW 316 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW 316 (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Leopard. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Leopard. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 316 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1982 Nissan Leopard. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW 316 (165 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Leopard. (148 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1998 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Leopard.

Compare all specifications:

1998 BMW 316 1982 Nissan Leopard
Make BMW Nissan
Model 316 Leopard
Year Released 1998 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1895 cc 1770 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 165 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1250 kg 1105 kg
Vehicle Length 4220 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2630 mm