1998 BMW 316 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1998 BMW 316. (103 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 316 weights approximately 43 kg more than 2006 Toyota Matrix.

Because 1998 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 165 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 1998 BMW 316 has automatic transmission and 2006 Toyota Matrix has manual transmission. 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 BMW 316 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1998 BMW 316 2006 Toyota Matrix
Make BMW Toyota
Model 316 Matrix
Year Released 1998 2006
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1895 cc 1786 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 103 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 165 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.5 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1398 kg 1355 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 6.7 L/100km 6.5 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.8 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9 L/100km 7.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]