1998 BMW 316 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 316 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1998 BMW 316. (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 316.

Because 1998 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 316. (165 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 316.

Compare all specifications:

1998 BMW 316 2012 Toyota Matrix
Make BMW Toyota
Model 316 Matrix
Year Released 1998 2012
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1895 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 165 Nm 219 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1549 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2601 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 50 L