1998 BMW 316 vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 316 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1998 BMW 316. (103 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 394 kg more than 1998 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 316. (165 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 316 | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 316 | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 12.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1754 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1621 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.1 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.4 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 53 L |