1998 BMW 318 vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 318. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 318 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1998 BMW 318. (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 318.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 318. (180 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 318.

Compare all specifications:

1998 BMW 318 2010 Jaguar XJ
Make BMW Jaguar
Model 318 XJ
Year Released 1998 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1895 cc 4200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 116 HP 297 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 180 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Top Speed 203 km/hour 194 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4970 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3040 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.1 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.2 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 85 L