1998 BMW 320 vs. 1972 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1998 BMW 320 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1998 BMW 320. (150 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 665 kg more than 1998 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW 320 | 1972 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 320 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 2130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3310 mm |
