1998 BMW 320 vs. 1992 Volvo 960
To start off, 1998 BMW 320 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1998 BMW 320. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 960 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1998 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 320 | 1992 Volvo 960 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 320 | 960 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2780 mm |