1998 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 320 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 535 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 320. (280 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 320. 1998 BMW 320 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 BMW 320 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW 320 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | 320 | HRT |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Top Speed | 207 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
