1998 BMW 320 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 320 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1998 BMW 320. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 437 kg more than 1998 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 320. (190 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 320 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 320 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 76 L |