1998 BMW 320 vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 320 would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1998 BMW 320. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 479 kg more than 1998 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 320. (280 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 320 | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | 320 | Canyon |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 3458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |