1998 BMW 320 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1998 BMW 320. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 320 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.

Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW 320 (280 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (252 Nm). This means 1998 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

1998 BMW 320 2005 Ford Ranger
Make BMW Ford
Model 320 Ranger
Year Released 1998 2005
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1951 cc 2983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 134 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 252 Nm
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 80 mm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1476 kg 1311 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Consumption 5.6 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 9.2 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.9 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 64 L