1998 BMW 320 vs. 2006 Ford E-350

To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 320 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1998 BMW 320. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 320 weights approximately 256 kg more than 2006 Ford E-350.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 320. (280 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

1998 BMW 320 2006 Ford E-350
Make BMW Ford
Model 320 E-350
Year Released 1998 2006
Body Type Sedan Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1951 cc 5407 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 134 HP 255 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 475 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 19.0:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 12 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1476 kg 1220 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 5390 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 2120 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3510 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.9 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 132 L