1998 BMW 320 vs. 2011 Chrysler 200

To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 320 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1998 BMW 320. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 320.

Because 1998 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 320. (280 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2011 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

1998 BMW 320 2011 Chrysler 200
Make BMW Chrysler
Model 320 200
Year Released 1998 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1951 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 134 HP 283 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 352 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4948 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2766 mm
Fuel Consumption 5.6 L/100km 8.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 9.2 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 64 L