1998 BMW 323 vs. 2000 BMW Z3
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1998 BMW 323. (170 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 323 weights approximately 232 kg more than 2000 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW 323 (246 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z3. (237 Nm). This means 1998 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 323 | 2000 BMW Z3 | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | 323 | Z3 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 246 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 74.9 mm |
Top Speed | 231 km/hour | 206 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1547 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |