1998 BMW 323 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 323 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1998 BMW 323. (170 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (370 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 323. (246 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 323 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | BMW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 323 | E |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 246 Nm | 370 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 86 mm |
Top Speed | 231 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |