1998 BMW 330 vs. 1990 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1998 BMW 330 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW 330 (189 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 330 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1990 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 BMW 330 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW 330. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW 330 (400 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 BMW 330 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW 330 | 1990 Chrysler ES | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | 330 | ES |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2470 mm |
