1998 BMW 728 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1998 BMW 728 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW 728 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 728 weights approximately 479 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1998 BMW 728 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW 728. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 728 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | 728 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2680 mm |