1998 BMW 728 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 728. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 728 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (259 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1998 BMW 728. (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 728.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW 728 (280 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (253 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1998 BMW 728 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW 728 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 728 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 259 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 253 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
