1998 BMW 740 vs. 1958 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1998 BMW 740 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW 740 (286 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac Sixty. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW 740 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 267 kg more than 1998 BMW 740.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW 740 | 1958 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 740 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1968 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 3390 mm |
