1998 BMW 740 vs. 1965 Holden EH
To start off, 1998 BMW 740 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 BMW 740 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW 740 (286 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW 740 should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 740 weights approximately 783 kg more than 1965 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW 740 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Holden EH. (238 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1998 BMW 740 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 740 | 1965 Holden EH | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 740 | EH |
Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 238 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1968 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2680 mm |