1998 BMW 740 vs. 1967 Holden HR
To start off, 1998 BMW 740 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 BMW 740 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW 740 (286 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW 740 should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW 740 weights approximately 678 kg more than 1967 Holden HR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW 740 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1998 BMW 740 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 740 | 1967 Holden HR | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 740 | HR |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1968 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2700 mm |