1998 BMW M vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1998 BMW M is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW M (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW M should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW M weights approximately 676 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 BMW M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW M | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | M | 102 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2160 mm |
