1998 BMW Pickster vs. 1982 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1998 BMW Pickster is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW Pickster (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. (123 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW Pickster should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 1998 BMW Pickster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW Pickster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW Pickster (345 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Cadillac Eldorado. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1998 BMW Pickster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Cadillac Eldorado.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW Pickster | 1982 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Pickster | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 4080 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |