1998 BMW Pickster vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1998 BMW Pickster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW Pickster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW Pickster (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW Pickster should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Because 1998 BMW Pickster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW Pickster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW Pickster (345 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1998 BMW Pickster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW Pickster | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | Pickster | Midge |
Year Released | 1998 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |