1998 BMW Pickster vs. 2000 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW Pickster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW Pickster would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW Pickster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW Pickster (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (189 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW Pickster should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica.

Because 1998 BMW Pickster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW Pickster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW Pickster (345 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 1998 BMW Pickster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.

Compare all specifications:

1998 BMW Pickster 2000 Toyota Celica
Make BMW Toyota
Model Pickster Celica
Year Released 1998 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3201 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 317 HP 189 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 7800 RPM
Torque 345 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 6800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.4 mm 82.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 11.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1320 mm