1998 BMW V12 vs. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 1998 BMW V12 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 451 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 286 kg more than 1998 BMW V12.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 BMW V12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 593 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (316 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW V12 | 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | V12 | Grand Wagoneer |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 4980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 570 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3450 RPM |
| Torque | 909 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2800 mm |
