1998 BMW V12 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 BMW V12 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 362 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 416 kg more than 1998 BMW V12.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW V12 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | V12 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 570 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 2030 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3300 mm |
