1998 BMW V12 vs. 1964 Simca 1300
To start off, 1998 BMW V12 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 519 more horse power than 1964 Simca 1300. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 1964 Simca 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW V12 weights approximately 624 kg more than 1964 Simca 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 807 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Simca 1300. (102 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Simca 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW V12 | 1964 Simca 1300 | |
| Make | BMW | Simca |
| Model | V12 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 570 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 909 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 990 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2530 mm |
