1998 BMW V12 vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Neon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 511 more horse power than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2000 Plymouth Neon.
Because 1998 BMW V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 749 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (160 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Plymouth Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW V12 | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
Make | BMW | Plymouth |
Model | V12 | Neon |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 570 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 909 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2650 mm |