1998 BMW V12 vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 410 more horse power than 2002 Volvo XC90. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1998 BMW V12.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 BMW V12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 558 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo XC90. (351 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW V12 | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | V12 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 570 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 909 Nm | 351 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 2114 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2800 mm |
