1998 BMW V12 vs. 2003 MG ZT

To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 441 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW V12 weights approximately 129 kg more than 2003 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1998 BMW V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 609 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZT. (300 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZT.

Compare all specifications: