1998 BMW V12 vs. 2005 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2005 Kia Sedona is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 375 more horse power than 2005 Kia Sedona. (195 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Sedona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Sedona weights approximately 473 kg more than 1998 BMW V12.
Because 1998 BMW V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 613 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Sedona. (296 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Sedona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW V12 | 2005 Kia Sedona | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | V12 | Sedona |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 3489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 570 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 909 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 2087 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2920 mm |
