1998 BMW V12 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac STS. (321 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac STS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 204 kg more than 1998 BMW V12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac STS. (427 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW V12 | 2006 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | V12 | STS |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 570 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 909 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1818 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2960 mm |
