1998 BMW V12 vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 432 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Compass. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 BMW V12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 599 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (310 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass. 1998 BMW V12 has automatic transmission and 2009 Jeep Compass has manual transmission. 2009 Jeep Compass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 BMW V12 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW V12 | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | V12 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 570 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 909 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1614 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2640 mm |
