1998 BMW V12 vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 422 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 3.
Because 1998 BMW V12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW V12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 549 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 3. (360 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 3. 1998 BMW V12 has automatic transmission and 2011 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2011 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 BMW V12 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW V12 | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | V12 | 3 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 570 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 909 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2639 mm |