1998 BMW V12 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW V12 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW V12 (570 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (268 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac ATS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW V12 weights approximately 84 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 556 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (353 Nm). This means 1998 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW V12 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | V12 | ATS |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 570 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 909 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2776 mm |