1998 BMW Z3 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1998 BMW Z3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW Z3 (240 HP) has 189 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW Z3 weights approximately 425 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW Z3 (320 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 1998 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW Z3 | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | Z3 | FX |
Year Released | 1998 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 136 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |