1998 BMW Z3 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 BMW Z3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW Z3 (240 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1998 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 BMW Z3 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3300 mm |
