1998 BMW Z3 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 BMW Z3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1998 BMW Z3. (191 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1998 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW Z3 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z3 | 62 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 7028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3300 mm |