1998 BMW Z3 vs. 1967 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1998 BMW Z3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW Z3 (240 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1967 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1967 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 BMW Z3 weights approximately 655 kg more than 1967 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW Z3 (320 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 1998 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW Z3 | 1967 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | BMW | ZAZ |
Model | Z3 | 966 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 886 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 52 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2170 mm |