1998 BMW Z3 vs. 2000 Chrysler Java
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Java is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW Z3 (240 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Java. (81 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Java.
Because 1998 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW Z3 | 2000 Chrysler Java | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | Z3 | Java |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1580 mm |