1998 BMW Z3 vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW Z3 (240 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Patriot. (158 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Patriot.
Because 1998 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 BMW Z3 (320 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Patriot. (191 Nm). This means 1998 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Patriot.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW Z3 | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | Z3 | Patriot |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 191 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2634 mm |