1998 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 456 kg more than 1998 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Bristol Blenheim | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Blenheim | 62 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 6381 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 325 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1762 kg | 2218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 75 L |