1998 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1992 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1998 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 537 kg more than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Because 1998 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Bristol Blenheim | 1992 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
Model | Blenheim | ES |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1762 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2470 mm |